“”Results suggest that there is no significant difference in the Amazon rankings. This suggests that releasing academic books on open access does not lessen printed book sales online in comparison with traditional university presses using Amazon.com and Amazon.ca rankings. On the other hand, AUPress, because it is open access and publicly available at no cost, can boast of having a significantly larger readership for its books. The traditional university presses, because of their cost, print-only format, and other proprietary limitations are not readily available and therefore not accessible to many potential readers.” “
Tags:
OpenEdition vous propose de citer ce billet de la manière suivante :
cléoradar (21 octobre 2011). Comparison of an Open Access University Press with Traditional Presses. Cléo Radar. Consulté le 13 janvier 2025 à l’adresse https://cleoradar.hypotheses.org/15884