“The most interesting question to arise so far is whether digital humanities projects like the OBO are films or science papers. Not literally of course, but in terms of the model of credit offered to contributors of the finished product. Both films and science journals have developed unique models of credit. In films, the credits run at the end. In science papers, everyone who made a meaningful contribution gets listed as an author and those who made minor contributions get an acknowledgement. I will argue that digital humanists would be doing their field and industry a great service by adopting both models simultaneously. The OBO and projects like it are both films and science papers.”
Tags:
OpenEdition vous propose de citer ce billet de la manière suivante :
cléoradar (25 janvier 2012). Thoughts on Public & Digital History by Adam Crymble: Citation in Digital Humanities: Is the Old Bailey Online a Film, or a Science Paper? Cléo Radar. Consulté le 13 décembre 2024 à l’adresse https://cleoradar.hypotheses.org/16351